<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital cameras have unique &#8220;noise&#8221; fingerprints?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jermexpress.com/technology/digital-cameras-have-unique-noise-fingerprints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jermexpress.com/technology/digital-cameras-have-unique-noise-fingerprints/</link>
	<description>jerm is a blog designer, an ex-inline-skater, a mac lover, a retired pick up artist, and a half-vampire.  but at the end of the day he's just here to share his newfound freedom with others.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: paranoia</title>
		<link>http://www.jermexpress.com/technology/digital-cameras-have-unique-noise-fingerprints/#comment-91010</link>
		<dc:creator>paranoia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jermexpress.com/archives/2006/04/24/digital-cameras-have-unique-noise-fingerprints/#comment-91010</guid>
		<description>I would not be surprised that after carefull analisis it shows that the noise represents the serial number of the camera and name of manufacturer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not be surprised that after carefull analisis it shows that the noise represents the serial number of the camera and name of manufacturer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Havlik</title>
		<link>http://www.jermexpress.com/technology/digital-cameras-have-unique-noise-fingerprints/#comment-22811</link>
		<dc:creator>John Havlik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jermexpress.com/archives/2006/04/24/digital-cameras-have-unique-noise-fingerprints/#comment-22811</guid>
		<description>For some reason I have to say that the noise may be specific for a certian model and manfacture of the camera, but two identical cameras are bound to have very simmilar noises. Besides this could be eliminated with a tad of Photoshop/Gimp photo manipulation, they would be able to tell that you photo manipulated it but it would be much more difficult to tace down to a single camera, interesting though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason I have to say that the noise may be specific for a certian model and manfacture of the camera, but two identical cameras are bound to have very simmilar noises. Besides this could be eliminated with a tad of Photoshop/Gimp photo manipulation, they would be able to tell that you photo manipulated it but it would be much more difficult to tace down to a single camera, interesting though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JErm</title>
		<link>http://www.jermexpress.com/technology/digital-cameras-have-unique-noise-fingerprints/#comment-22705</link>
		<dc:creator>JErm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 05:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jermexpress.com/archives/2006/04/24/digital-cameras-have-unique-noise-fingerprints/#comment-22705</guid>
		<description>It's the beginning of something big though, less room for privacy each day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the beginning of something big though, less room for privacy each day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexine</title>
		<link>http://www.jermexpress.com/technology/digital-cameras-have-unique-noise-fingerprints/#comment-22612</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jermexpress.com/archives/2006/04/24/digital-cameras-have-unique-noise-fingerprints/#comment-22612</guid>
		<description>That sounds really cool, and kind of freaky at the same time o.O; But since they only proved it with 9 cameras, I have trouble believing that it's true for every camera. They're bound to have duplicate patterns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds really cool, and kind of freaky at the same time o.O; But since they only proved it with 9 cameras, I have trouble believing that it&#8217;s true for every camera. They&#8217;re bound to have duplicate patterns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
