Comments on: Selling Links (or Selling Out?) http://www.jermexpress.com/domain/selling-links-or-selling-out/ jerm is a blog designer, an ex-inline-skater, a mac lover, a retired pick up artist, and a half-vampire. but at the end of the day he's just here to share his newfound freedom with others. Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:06:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Extremelee http://www.jermexpress.com/domain/selling-links-or-selling-out/#comment-44331 Extremelee Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:32:18 +0000 http://www.jermexpress.com/archives/2006/07/13/selling-links-or-selling-out/#comment-44331 All the controversy aside mate, sounds like you're making a real impact with your blogging profession. Wish I was still part of the game, life in London simply wouldn't allow it though unless I was making enough to pay the bills ;) PEACE! All the controversy aside mate, sounds like you’re making a real impact with your blogging profession. Wish I was still part of the game, life in London simply wouldn’t allow it though unless I was making enough to pay the bills ;)

PEACE!

]]> By: JErm http://www.jermexpress.com/domain/selling-links-or-selling-out/#comment-44328 JErm Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:23:57 +0000 http://www.jermexpress.com/archives/2006/07/13/selling-links-or-selling-out/#comment-44328 Woa really? Do you have some URLs for me? This is interesting, I never really thought about it in that perspective because I still believe that money can't buy everything. Most sites won't sell links anyway so this wouldn't work as a whole even if a lot of people are doing it. For example, despite what you may think from what I wrote, I've turned down companies wanting to buy links from me, and all you see from by blog(s) are free links so far, exclusive to friends and real affiliates. So I guess I'm just luring for controversy! ;) Woa really? Do you have some URLs for me? This is interesting, I never really thought about it in that perspective because I still believe that money can’t buy everything. Most sites won’t sell links anyway so this wouldn’t work as a whole even if a lot of people are doing it. For example, despite what you may think from what I wrote, I’ve turned down companies wanting to buy links from me, and all you see from by blog(s) are free links so far, exclusive to friends and real affiliates. So I guess I’m just luring for controversy! ;)

]]> By: James Weirick http://www.jermexpress.com/domain/selling-links-or-selling-out/#comment-44276 James Weirick Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:20:25 +0000 http://www.jermexpress.com/archives/2006/07/13/selling-links-or-selling-out/#comment-44276 Oh yeah I forgot. More to the point of your article. If everybody sold links, wouldn't that just screw up ranking by relevance and make your search results only show you the sites with the most money? I'd rather see what people link to without being paid for it. Oh yeah I forgot. More to the point of your article. If everybody sold links, wouldn’t that just screw up ranking by relevance and make your search results only show you the sites with the most money? I’d rather see what people link to without being paid for it.

]]> By: James Weirick http://www.jermexpress.com/domain/selling-links-or-selling-out/#comment-44206 James Weirick Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:04:18 +0000 http://www.jermexpress.com/archives/2006/07/13/selling-links-or-selling-out/#comment-44206 Actually, you stole this idea from the likes of W3C and WordPress. Google has a name for it actually, its called <i>link fraud</i>. It can get all sites involved banned from the Google index. Although W3C and WordPress are still in there because they paid Google a ton of money and promised not to do it again. But most sites just get banned without the option of paying. Actually, you stole this idea from the likes of W3C and WordPress. Google has a name for it actually, its called link fraud. It can get all sites involved banned from the Google index. Although W3C and WordPress are still in there because they paid Google a ton of money and promised not to do it again. But most sites just get banned without the option of paying.

]]>